Bitcoin
Trump May Be Considering Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset to Join ‘SoftWar’ Road to $1 Million
Jason Lowery, author of “SoftWar: A New Theory of Power Projection and the National Strategic Importance of Bitcoin,” revealed In early June, members of Donald Trump’s campaign administration contacted him about his experience with Bitcoin.
“I can confirm that I have been contacted by people in the Trump campaign administration about you-know-what. I have told them that I am ready and willing to relocate to DC if asked.”
In his remarks, Lowery emphasized the importance of Bitcoin to national security and its strategic significance to the U.S. military, particularly in cyberspace defense and security. He suggested the formation of a “U.S. Hash Force” and discussed the potential establishment of a new government agency to oversee Bitcoin-related initiatives.
Bottom proposed that agencies such as the Department of Energy (DoE) and the Department of Defense (DoD) would be involved. Specifically, he recommended that U.S. Cyber Command (USCYBERCOM) or U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) establish a Combined Hash Force Component Command (CHFCC).
“In my thesis, I recommend that USCYBERCOM or USSTRATCOM have a Combined Hash Force Component Command (CHFCC) involving FVEYE and NATO countries.”
This command would collaborate with FVEYE and NATO countries to counter similar efforts by Russia and China in the evolving digital warfare landscape, which he calls “#Softwar.”
A few days later, Lowery enigmatically announced“Let the #softwar begin 🇺🇸🦌
🫡🤫👋” and later declared that he was “missing”, which implies a period of reduced public communication or greater secrecy.
Bottom emphasized his political neutrality, stating that he supports any Commander-in-Chief and does not endorse any political party. He clarified that only the Trump campaign had contacted him.
Bitcoin as a reserve asset in the US
Most recently, in response to Dylan LeClair sharing a Forbes article highlighting Trump’s discussions of Bitcoin as a strategic reserve asset, Lowery he responded with a suggestive winking emoji, indicating their awareness and possible involvement in these high-level strategic conversations about Bitcoin’s future role in national security and economic policy.
At the articleSam Lyman, Director of Public Policy at Riot Platforms, discusses the emerging political discourse around Bitcoin as a potential strategic reserve asset. This conversation was notably fueled by former President Donald Trump vocal support for Bitcoin in his election campaign. Trump’s comments highlight the geopolitical implications of Bitcoin, suggesting that policies that limit its use would inadvertently benefit adversaries like China and Russia.
Lyman comments that Trump is not alone in this stance. Figures such as the former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and senator Cynthia Lummis have also advocated for the strategic integration of Bitcoin into the U.S. financial system. Ramaswamy has proposed backing the dollar with a basket of commodities, including Bitcoin, to combat inflation, an idea that mirrors a similar proposal by independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The article also features insights from Alex Thorn of Galaxy Digital, who highlights Bitcoin’s potential to play a significant role in global finance. Thorn argues that as Bitcoin becomes more integrated into institutional portfolios and corporate balance sheets, it could be similarly adopted by nation states.
Lyman echoed Lummis’ comment stating that the United States, currently the largest holder of Bitcoin among nation-states, could further leverage that position by officially recognizing Bitcoin as a strategic currency. reserve asset. Lummis believes this move could trigger a global race among countries to secure Bitcoin, expanding its role in international trade and geopolitics.
Lyman highlights the potential benefits of such a strategy through the success stories of MicroStrategy, a company that revitalized its fortunes by investing heavily in Bitcoin, and El Salvador, which has seen significant returns on its Bitcoin investments since making it legal tender.
Finally, Lowery’s comments that he went “in the dark” a month ago and his recent cryptic response to a post about Bitcoin being considered a reserve asset raise questions about whether Lowery was actually in DC discussing Bitcoin with political parties. Furthermore, Lowery had previously deleted any Bitcoin-related posts from his X account within 48 hours. However, these recent posts have remained since June 8.
According to Lowery, Bitcoin could reach US$1 million per coin as the next step in SoftWar if and when the US accepts it as a weapons system rather than simply a peer-to-peer currency.